|
||||
|
Re: Rogers' Telephony Plans: Underwhelming
by
Anonymous
There's no real such thing as POTS "from that point on" anymore. The access and termination points are of course dependent on Rogers and the terminating carrier.
But the in-between part is pretty much a dog's breakfast, and that goes for Bell POTS, SBC, Rogers, or anyone else. To understand why, see a minutes trading marketplace like Arbinet. A pretty impressive proportion of "POTS" LD traffic was transiting as IP and, in many instances, over the public Internet as of years ago. And it's been a long time now that TELUS announced that it had converted its network core to IP.
Fundamentally, what matters is whether the carrier is managing its own traffic on a dedicated network, or whether it's leaving it up to someone else to deal with. The latter describes the Internet. The former describes internal traffic engineering -- IP over ATM over fibre, TDM over ATM over fibre, TDM over frame-relay over satellite, whatever. "POTS", after all, is not a protocol, only a service specification.
|
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel and Twitterrati. You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||
|
||||