|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: RIM's Fuzzy Strategy
by
Anonymous
Please do yourself a favor and review what I said before commenting. Your comment "BTW if RIM had a "low" 6-8% of the mobile market do you have any clue as to where their stock would be (hint: a lot higher)." With a subscriber base of over 2 MILLION, RIM is clearly the CURRENT leader in the MOBILE EMAIL SPACE. However with over a BILLION Mobile subscribers worldwide and RIM's recent introduction of the first device that actually works as a phone, my math indicates that is about .002% of the MOBILE MARKET.
Rim has been forced toward this model BECAUSE of its inability to scale well, provide access to multiple mailstores from the same BES, lack of support for anything other than Exchange and Domino, and Blackberries have never been very popular beyond Mahogany Row Executives.
With Microsoft working with many device vendors (Palm, Nokia, Sony/Ericsson...) and Exchange2003's ability to provide native support for MOBILE MAIL SERVICES, as well as a host of other upstarts such as CTI2, Danger, Consilient, Sierra Wireless's VoqMail, and Corsoft's Aileron just to name a few.
I truly believe that if RIM continues in its proprietary approach to MOBILE MAIL, then it will end up like so many other INDUSTRY PIONEERS (DEC, Tandem, Veritas, Lotus, PeopleSoft) bought by a bigger company or a Competitor.
BTW the tone of your response sounds like you work for RIM?
|
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel and Twitterrati. You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||
|
||||