|
||||
|
Re: Re: RIM's Fuzzy Strategy
by
Anonymous
RIM dead in 24 months? Good as a competitor? You are nuts dude. Have YOU ever looked at what Good charges? Same solution (not as robust), same price. Good is nothing, plus they have to pay royalties to RIM (they settled a suit that RIM filed).
RIM licensed because IT guys had this feeling they were locked into a proprietary platform. The IT folks feel better about choice, even though none of the licensed devices do a great job of BlackBerry.
RIM is the only company that I'm aware of with the entire solution from device to middleware to carrier relationships and support. You're telling me some little weenie company like Good or Seven is gonna stop them? Come on, this same argument existed years ago and it has never panned out. BTW if RIM had a "low" 6-8% of the mobile market do you have any clue as to where their stock would be (hint: a lot higher).
|
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel and Twitterrati. You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||
|
||||