|
||||
|
Re: Can the MSFT Titantic Change Directions?
by
Anonymous
I agree with much you have said and I do believe Microsoft shouldn't try to be something it is not. However I want to remind people of a few important facts that may help change some thinking. As in the past, Microsoft has done something really clever... it has some how managed to get a say in big standardization projects. It first started out with several of the common protocols now used in much of the technology used today... they managed to get a say in hardware development techniques and standardization for compatibility with windows.
Microsoft gets in on the ground floor of tons of projects.... even as I type this Microsoft is in deep with OpenXML which is going up for standardization approval in front of the ISO here real soon. This could mean a bigger part for Microsoft in the future of Office online and merging much of what is done with desktop apps with the Internet.
I cannot count how many times Microsoft has managed to bully markets around by developing the very heart of what other companies use. Other companies that do this (for example IBM) all manage to hold onto their respective markets because of it.
While the MSFT Titanic may be hard to steer, and take years to turn around on a good idea, they are more like an arctic icebreaker that can break the market ice... so in the end MSFT always gets where it needs to be and very few can stand in its way. (Except for maybe the Google and Yahoo icebergs which are more like an ice shelf... but we shall see what happens).
|
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel and Twitterrati. You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||
|
||||