|
||||
|
Re: Can Satellite-Radio Survive the iPod?
by
Anonymous
The point which I did not make very effectively was that you can often sell services as a lower-cost substitute for products requiring an up-front investment.
Also some people don't want iPods and some people don't have the required equipment, such as a computer, to make full use of an iPod.
This may not be a great business. And it may not be a mass-market business, at least in the U.S. and Canada. I would not bet the farm on it.
But I would consider it as one of several new approaches satellite broadcasters can experiment with in an attempt to discover profitable niches which they can grow.
Trying to discover a profitable niche makes a lot more sense than what the satellite radio companies are currently trying to do, which is to be the mass-market huge-content variety music option, a business which has been unable to make a profit since XM launched five years ago and now looks like it is getting tougher because of disruption by the iPod.
Larry is correct that a low-priced iPod accounts for a few months of satellite radio service. (US$79 for a new iPod Shuffle compares to about six months of basic XM radio at US$13 per month.)
The deduction I would draw is that the satellite service's price may have to fall, reversing a recent trend of price hikes. Financial risk is rising.
Re-orienting the satellites to another region where the monthly service option is more appealing and where an up-front iPod purchase is less appealing may be the right course of action.
Mike
www.OnDisruption.com
|
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel and Twitterrati. You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||
|
||||