|
||||
|
Re: To GSM or Not GSM, that is the Question
by
Ross
Analysts and been predicting the demise of CDMA networks for many years now. The claims, primarily based on scale issues and roaming restrictions, provide logical arguments for the advantages of GSM over CDMA. On the other hand, continued efforts by 3GPP2 (CDMA 3G standards organization) at 'harmonizing' some elements with GSM/UMTS, and recent growth in Chinese vendor production of dual mode handsets, is working to mitigate these advantages. As a result, CDMA has continued to play into the future of plans of operators like China Unicom and Verizon.
Regardless, the continuing marginalization of CDMA technology will put pressure on CDMA operators to explore alternatives, but changing out a network is not something that is done overnight. Although GSM technology and networks will be around for a very long time, at this point in the life cycle of this technology one has to wonder if it would be more prudent to focus on a 'next generation' option to leap frog the competition, as opposed to spending a billion dollars to become a 'me too' competitor. Meanwhile, the competition could be moving onto the next game.
One final note, in addition to watching the direction taken by dominant North American players like Verizon, it is worth watching the Chinese market. China still hasn't made a major commitment to 3G technologies, having just formally confirmed TD-SCDMA as their 3G standard this year. Consider that the largest mobile vendor in the world is not Verizon, or even Vodafone - it is China Telecom. Increasingly China, and Asia, will influence technology economics and direction.
|
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel and Twitterrati. You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||
|
||||