|
||||
|
Re: Feedpass: Vultures!
by
Anonymous
Well, well, well. The worldwide comments regarding Feedpass have certainly sparked some interesting discussion, haven't they?
I won't even bother extolling the virtues of feedpass in depth in this post. Clearly we, and thousands of others, think it's an idea with merit. There are some very vocal bloggers out there that don't, but that's to be expected. I'm sure that the concept of turning your feed over to FeedBurner might also have polarized a few people. At least with Feedpass, you don't turn over your feed.
The claiming process is easy and if it doesn't work for anyone, we would love to hear about it. Most people have no problem using the tools on our site. We've had just a handful of support emails since we launched.
Have you ever claimed a blog on Technorati? It's gotten a little easier lately for some blog formats, but for others, you still have to copy and paste code into your blog tempate, publish the blog, and the tell Technorati to finish the claim process. Very similar to our approach.
That being said, we're brand new and wide open to community feedback on how to make blog ownership verification easy. We're currently working on addressing the issue with FeedBurner, but the reality is that it is FeedBurner's fault for openly allowing anyone to "burn" a copy of anyone's feed.
In regards to what Feedpass does. We display only information provided in the feed, like the last 4 post titles and brief summaries of each. Even if the feed is pushing out full posts, like the FeedBurner feed that Alec Saunders stole today, we at least show only the excerpts. FeedBurner, on the other hand, displays full feeds. Check it out at http://feeds.feedburner.com/feedburner/kQNU
Okay, so maybe it boils down to the ads and who gets paid? If so, then what about the hundreds of thousands, or even millions of blogs that display ads all over their pages while they provide article titles and links to other blog content? What is different about that? Add Technorati and others to the mix too. They all benefit from other publishers' content.
So if I own a website and want to point to a blog or feed that I like, why not earn a few bucks by using a Feedpass link to point to the feed? It's not full feeds, just titles and excerpts, so is that wrong?
And if I don't care about the money, but just want to make a great landing page for my own feed, without turning it over to FeedBurner, Feedpass clearly serves a purpose.
Jim
Feedpass
|
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel and Twitterrati. You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||
|
||||