The best question on the conference call was from the journalist who asked, well, on one hand you say you don't want to price anticompetitively, and on the other hand you're circling the wagons around a decision that prevents you from pricing anticompetitively -- what gives? Not that there's anything wrong with this appraoch but what I want to know is what Bell and Telus plan to do with VOIP while Canada's cabinet considers their appeal - a process that could take a year to complete. Um, compete? They can go as low as about $8. I'd say they're doing just fine. Incidentally, it's interesting that Bell's Digital Voice service, which claims to be an Internet Voice service that will work over any high-speed Internet access, is only available in three Quebec cities. Huh? If I subscribe to it from Toronto, why wouldn't it work just as well? In other words, what isn't Bell telling us about its proposed service -- and why hasn't any journalist pointed this apparent incongruity out?