I have to take issue with the New York Times' assertion, that Old - new New - Media was a winner during the World Cup because of strong television ratings and healthy newspaper sales. While I'm not disputing a lot of people watched TV and devoured newspaper coverage, it is wrong to dismiss New Media as simply playing a "supplementary role". You only need to look at how many people got their World Cup fix from Web sites and blogs to look at how New Media played an active role. As well, the World Cup also provided high-definition technology with a tremendous showcase to demonstrate how compelling it can be. The experience watching the final between France and Italy yesterday on HD-compatible large-screen TV was awesome, and likely gave many people with a reason to check out HD. Tags: ,