So, Bill Gates is retiring to enjoy the bucolic life as Microsoft's chairman and "advisor" on key projects - albeit a couple years down the road. It's makes you wonder about his legacy as he ever so slowly walks away from the software giant he co-founded. in 1975 with Paul Allen. Should we look at Gates as an innovator, super-salesman or brilliant, but ruthless, strategist? You could make an argument Gates is under-appreciated because Microsoft has become the high-tech company people love to diss/dismiss, which is what happens when you're top dog for so long. If we want to "praise Caesar, not to buy him" (apologies for the Shakespeare mash-up), we should focus on how much he's able to accomplish next with this philanthropic work around the world with all his billions of dollars. Unlike a lot of young, super-successful high-tech executives, Gates has been an active philanthropist, who has focus on issues such as AIDS, tuberculosis and immunization.
Update: Business 2.0 has a column on why CEO Steve Ballmer should step down, citing his many "gaffes" and the stock's lacklustre performance.