Amid the frenzy of coverage surrounding Apple's Boot Camp announcement yesterday, YouTube's $8-million private equity round involving Sequoia Capital didn't get mucha attention. It's a noteworthy development, however, given YouTube's fast-growing popularity and hot it is frequently mentioned whenever anyone talks about the future of television. It could be that YouTube fails to cash in from TV 2.0 but it is a perfect illustration of the demand for "pull" programming in which consumers get what they want, when they want it. For Sequoia, the attraction has to be YouTube's traffic, which tops 100 million page views and six million unique users a day. "YouTube has an opportunity to expand its business while allowing its users to continue to share in the entertainment experience they have created," said Roelof Both, a Sequoia Capital Partners. Translation: This Web site is red-hot and with some of our venture capital, it could become even more popular, generate some revenue and be snapped up for big-time money by someone (Rupert Murdoch) scrambling for a foothold in TV 2.0"
  One obstacle YouTube and Sequoia need to address before they starting pouring through the M&A offers is how YouTube's going to make money. Like many Web 2.0 companies, it's long on coolness and short of revenue generation tools, which puts it firmly into the "build it and hopefully the money will come" camp. YouTube CEO Chad Hurley told PBS' Mark Glaser the business model is built on a relevant advertising model but the company is "moving cautiously to ensure we don't disrupt the goodness of the community". It looks like YouTube faces the same dilemma as Rocketboom: people love the content because it's not TV so inserting advertising is tricky because you don't want to alienate your audience. This has prompted Rocketboom to put advertising after each three-minute clip. It's probably not the ideal solution but Rocketboom is hoping it will resonate with consumers because each ad will be created in-house with the Rocketboom look and feel.
  For more on YouTube and the video market: TechCrunch has a post on the growing variety of online services, Don Dodge provides a legal overview on why YouTube is different from Napster, while Mathew Ingram covers off a variety of YouTube angles.