As blogs become more mainstream and increasingly seen as credible sources of information, more people are asking questions such as: "Are bloggers journalists?" or "How can newspapers thrive/survive amid community journalism and blogging?". Dave Winer, who has played a leading role in the development of RSS, OMPL and podcasting, waded into the fray recently during an interview with Rocketboom.com's Amanda Congdon. I haven't seen the clip but he seemed to suggest the difference between a journalist and a blogger is journalists write for money, while amateurs do it for love. He also said amateurs have "less conflict of interest and less reason not to tell [the] truth than if you have to pay the bills and please somebody else" (hat tip to Poynter On line). It's certainly a different viewpoint but Winer has never been one for taking the easy way out. But he does raise an excellent point about how traditional media such as newspapers and magazines survive within Journalism 2.0. Obviously, they need to embrace blogging and podcasts as additional tools to distribute information - much like they have adopted Web sites. Fundamentally, however, traditional media have to leverage their biggest and best assets: their brands, credibility and resources.Over the past 50 to 100 years, newspapers have developed strong brands that resonate with consumers. Whether it's the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall St. Journal or Peterborough Examiner, newspapers have a solid, well-entrenched presences within their communities. And for the most part, I think people trust newspapers or at least see them as credible sources of information (even if surveys suggest many people don't trust journalists) at a time when there are more doubts about what's accurate on the Web if anyone can publish something. So rather than dismiss the blogs, podcasts and video blogs and/or worry about their business models, traditional media must leverage the technology and have their reporters embrace these new tools. For those who choose to ignore the new tools, it's been nice knowing you.
Addendum: The future of media/journalism is one of the four streams being explored at the mesh conference in Toronto on May 15/16.
|
||||||||||||||
Comments
Re: Bloggers vs. Journalists
by
Robert
on Tue 25 Apr 2006 09:56 AM EDT | Permanent Link
Most "street-level" journalists understand the power of blogs while managers don't because blogs disrupt their business planning. When traditional media does embrace blogging, the results are often a disaster as they try to do with blogs what they do in print.
Robert Ouellette, Editor gagglescape.com, readingtoronto.com, and columnist at the National Post. Re: Bloggers vs. Journalists
by
Anonymous
on Fri 28 Apr 2006 05:51 AM EDT | Permanent Link
Presumably you've seen the "Googlezon" media clip that 'predicts' this?
Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: Weblogs that reference this article:
|
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's on Wordpress and part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||