Have you ever come across an extraordinarily long URL and wondered: why does it have to be that long and is there a way to shorten it so it could become more user-friendly in an e-mail or blog post? (Wow, that's a long first sentence could be shortened!).
The answer to the second question is TinyURL.com, a small online utility that quickly squeezes URLs to a much more manageable size. For whatever reason, ZDNet's David Berlind believes that TinyURL has the potential to be the next YouTube because...well, I'm really sure other than his theory that anyone who squeezes a URL must be really interested in that particular Web site, which could be extremely valuable data for marketers. Berlind tracked down TinyURL's developer, Kevin Gilbertson, a podcast. The interview reveals Berlind's theory is way ahead of what Gilbertson thinks, including the idea a big Web player could come along and snap up TinyURL for big bucks.
MakeYouGoHmm.com, which developed a rival URL utility called tdurl.com in 2004, doesn't understand why Berlind is so excited about TinyURL.com, which has squeezed 28 million URLs so far, and generates revenue from Yahoo ads. In fact, he's surprised that ZDNet doesn't own its own URL shortening service.
|
||||||||
TinyURL A Big Utility...but the Next YouTube??
by
Mark Evans
on Mon 04 Dec 2006 07:40 AM EST | Permanent Link
Comments
Re: TinyURL A Big Utility...but the Next YouTube??
by
tamera kremer
on Mon 04 Dec 2006 10:36 AM EST | Permanent Link
I wonder though if Tiny URL will continue to be used as frequently as it has been as consumers (and businesses) become more savvy about search and how the engines crawl the Net. The format of the URL provides an additional SEO tool, not only for the end site, but for the site citing/ sharing the post... I love being able to truncate URL's, but Google Juice is more important in the long run.
Re: TinyURL A Big Utility...but the Next YouTube??
by
Anon
on Mon 04 Dec 2006 12:04 PM EST | Permanent Link
There are many, many, such services:
http://feedbus.com/weblogs/shorterurls.html Estimated time to code my own such site: two days, which includes everything related to the site. A fully-functional prototype would be operational in 20 minutes, and most of that 20 minutes would be creating the database tables. Yahoo et. al. would never pay big bucks for such a site. What I hear David Berlind saying is "Look, I just discovered that some websites offer E-MAIL - fully-electronic mail that doesn't use paper at all!" Brilliant. Re: Re: TinyURL A Big Utility...but the Next YouTube??
by
Paul
on Mon 04 Dec 2006 03:02 PM EST | Permanent Link
I know that a site like this would be simple to code, but I think what gives it it's value is the fact that it already has millions of users. Look at imageshack.us, it might not be quite as trivial to code, but it is still something that someone with a little knowledge in their language of choice could create in a week or so. In my experience the value of a site has to do more with the number of users than anything else.
Re: TinyURL A Big Utility...but the Next YouTube??
by
Anonymous
on Mon 04 Dec 2006 07:13 PM EST | Permanent Link
Add SnipURL to that pile of multi-billion dollar web sites.
http://snipurl.com |
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel and Twitterrati. You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||||||
|
||||||||