So what's Google doing buying a radio advertising company? It's an intriguing question in the wake of Google's $102-million to US$1.24-billion (depending on future performance) purchase of dMarc Broadcasting. There are a few ways to look at it. One, it will let Google's existing customers easily access the radio market. Two, it could give Google a way to launch audio advertising on the Web. Still, it seems like a curious move. I mean, if Google can buy a company that provides radio ad-buying and tracking services, what's stopping it from buy a traditional ad-buying agency or an advertising agency to handle creative? The more deals done by Google, the more I get the impression Larry and Sergey are back in the lab running experiments - albeit with the luxury of having a business behind them that kicks off billions of dollar a year in free cash flow, and a sky-high stock price. Given its financial clout, Google can dabble with Wi-Fi, make a major investment acquire a cool start-up and hire some of the biggest high-tech brains such as Vinton Cerf. What makes Google so fascinating is its uniqueness. There is no other company with its combination of financial resources, business momentum, talent pool and strategic creativity. Even though Microsoft has more than $35-billion of cash, the software giant doesn't have the corporate culture or flexibility to match Google. Look at how Microsoft has done nothing on the Web 2.0 deal front while rivals such as Google, Yahoo and eBay have been on a buying spree (Yahoo has apparently picked up SearchFox, according to TechCrunch). Maybe what makes Google so compelling is you don't know where its next strategic zig or zag will be. Will Google buy the rest of AOL? Will it launch nation-wide Wi-Fi network supported by a fiber backbone? Will it make a play to dominate Madison Ave.? Only Larry and Sergey know for sure - and they're holding their cards real close the vest.
|
||||
|
Tuesday, January 17
by
Mark Evans
on Tue 17 Jan 2006 04:57 PM EST
So what's Google doing buying a radio advertising company? It's an intriguing question in the wake of Google's $102-million to US$1.24-billion (depending on future performance) purchase of dMarc Broadcasting. There are a few ways to look at it. One, it will let Google's existing customers easily access the radio market. Two, it could give Google a way to launch audio advertising on the Web. Still, it seems like a curious move. I mean, if Google can buy a company that provides radio ad-buying and tracking services, what's stopping it from buy a traditional ad-buying agency or an advertising agency to handle creative? The more deals done by Google, the more I get the impression Larry and Sergey are back in the lab running experiments - albeit with the luxury of having a business behind them that kicks off billions of dollar a year in free cash flow, and a sky-high stock price. Given its financial clout, Google can dabble with Wi-Fi, make a major investment acquire a cool start-up and hire some of the biggest high-tech brains such as Vinton Cerf. What makes Google so fascinating is its uniqueness. There is no other company with its combination of financial resources, business momentum, talent pool and strategic creativity. Even though Microsoft has more than $35-billion of cash, the software giant doesn't have the corporate culture or flexibility to match Google. Look at how Microsoft has done nothing on the Web 2.0 deal front while rivals such as Google, Yahoo and eBay have been on a buying spree (Yahoo has apparently picked up SearchFox, according to TechCrunch). Maybe what makes Google so compelling is you don't know where its next strategic zig or zag will be. Will Google buy the rest of AOL? Will it launch nation-wide Wi-Fi network supported by a fiber backbone? Will it make a play to dominate Madison Ave.? Only Larry and Sergey know for sure - and they're holding their cards real close the vest.
by
Mark Evans
on Tue 17 Jan 2006 11:03 AM EST
How fast can you go? It's become the question in the broadband market as Canadian carriers and cablecos battle it out for subscribers without reverting to - heaven forbid - lower prices. Videotron has raised the ante against Bell in Quebec by increasing the speed of its extreme high-speed service to 10Mbps from 6.5Mbps. This compares with Bell's 5Mbps "Ultra" service. If carriers and cablecos were smart, they would generate more revenue by charging customers for higher speeds - rather than playing around with the idea of charging downstreams fees (a.k.a tollgates) to content and service providers.Update: Moody's Investors Service expects Canadian cablecos will have 1.2 million local phone subscribers by the end of 2006, or 11% of the $10-billion local market. It suggests, however, that carriers will be in a better position to protect their local business once regulatory changes are implemented later this year.
by
Mark Evans
on Tue 17 Jan 2006 07:45 AM EST
Where there's smoke, there's usually fire, which is why many people expect Bell to unveil its IP-TV service soon. While there are few details, it will likely let consumers buy basic service and then have the freedom to purchase specific channels, rather than having to take bundles. It's possible the launch and/or strategic plan will be unveiled during Bell's annual investor day on Feb. 1. With Rogers and Videotron getting more aggressive about the local phone market, Bell has little choice but to fight back by getting into TV. A big question is whether Microsoft's IP-TV software is being used by Bell, which would be a much-needed win for Microsoft.
Update: Light Reading has a story on the IP-TV market in the U.S., and how BellSouth and Qwest are moving forward with plans to launch service this year.
by
Mark Evans
on Tue 17 Jan 2006 07:33 AM EST
It took awhile but I waded into the Sam Bulte copyright controversy with this week's column in the Financial Post (it's tucked behind our walled garden so you'll have to buy the paper to read it). I look at the awful optics of the Liberal MP's decision to participate in a $250-a-plate fundraiser organized for her by leading music, film, software and publishing executives just four days before the election, and how bloggers (Michael Geist, Rob Hyndman, Matthew Good, etc.) have led the way in examining the tight relationship between Bulte, who aspires to be Canada's Heritage Minister and thus have a key role in the reform of Canada's copyright laws, and the rights-holder community. To read the column, click here.Update: The Bare Naked Ladies' Steven Page has waded into the debate, suggesting Bill C-60 (the reformed copyright legislated) is not forward thinking, and only helps the music industry maintain the status quo. (hat tip to Rob Hyndman) |
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel and Twitterrati. You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||
|
||||
How fast can you go? It's become the question in the broadband market as Canadian carriers and cablecos battle it out for subscribers without reverting to - heaven forbid - lower prices. Videotron has raised the ante against Bell in Quebec by increasing the speed of its extreme high-speed service to 10Mbps from 6.5Mbps. This compares with Bell's 5Mbps "Ultra" service. If carriers and cablecos were smart, they would generate more revenue by charging customers for higher speeds - rather than playing around with the idea of charging downstreams fees (a.k.a tollgates) to content and service providers.
It took awhile but I waded into the