A few weeks ago, the New York Times had a story about the battle
between Apple CEO Steve Jobs and the music industry. Apparently, the
music industry wants to hike the price of a downloaded song by 50% to
$1.49 while Jobs wants to hold the line at 99 cents to keep demand
strong for iTunes. Given this fight, how does $1.99 to apparently
download a song to the new iTunes wireless phone fit into the strategic
scheme of things. Have the wireless and music industries over-estimated
the buying power of teenagers, or are they way too anxious to find a
new way to boost revenue? While I think a standard fee of 99 cents for
an online music download is too high - particularly for most older
material - $1.99 for a wireless iTunes download seems downright greedy.
Then again, it's been a long time since I was a free-spending teenager
so perhaps there's more money among the younger demographic than I
realize. At the same time, never under-estimate the music industry's
ability to read the market wrong.
Update: For Canadians anxious
get hold of the iTunes phone (otherwise known as the Motorola ROKR,
which is apparently pronounced as "Rocker"), it will be available
through Rogers by mid-September. The ROKR can hold up to 100 songs. According to Solutions Research Group,
50% of MP3 players hold less than 100 songs. As a result, SRG suggests
there is a fertile market for a "limited capacity" mobile phone/digital
music player. Yannick Laclau
thinks the additional iPod mobile fee is not outrageous because it is
"the value a consumer will be willing to pay to get the song they want NOW,
at a bus station, nightclub, beach, or wherever." I guess it's like
paying a premium for a milk at a convenience store that stays open late.
Apple also announced a new iPod called Nano, which is 80% smaller than
the original iPod. Nano comes in two flavours - a 4GB model that holds
1,000 songs for $249 and a 2GB model with a 500-song capacity for $199.
|
||||||
Comments
Re: iTunes Phone Finally Launched
by
Anonymous
on Wed 07 Sep 2005 12:44 PM EDT | Permanent Link
No, you're right on mark - we don't have the money and that's why we're the ones downloading via anyway we can get the music. The man just hasn't figured it out yet - we're untouchable - you can sue our parents, our schools, our older brothers and sisters, but we're untouchable. we find a wireless network, setup camp, download a few ablums here and there, and by RIAA standards and USA 'copyright' law we're multi-million dollar thieves. 1.99 vs Free. I don't think 1.99 wins nothn
|
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel and Twitterrati. You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||||
|
||||||