by
Mark Evans
on Sat 03 Dec 2005 08:12 AM EST

Nortel sure likes to lavish its CEOs financially. During the
telecom boom, it created a sweet options package that let John
Roth walk away with
$135-million in 2000. The board approved a bonus program that convinced
Frank Dunn he was going to have enough moo-lah to build a $10-million McMansion by Lake Ontario.

(Mind you, Dunn allegedly tried to cook the books to achieve the bonus). Most recently, Nortel said it was willing to
pay millions of dollars to Motorola so it wouldn't make it difficult for
Mike Zafirovski
to become president and CEO. The latest example of corporate largesse
is the going away package for Bill Owens. In additional to a $1-million
a year pension, Nortel is make retirement easy for
the ex-U.S. Admiral by
giving him
a $2-million lump-sum severance package
and a second lump sum worth as much as $3.4-million,
and accelerating the vesting for all of his 2.9 million stock options.
Owens did a nice job righting the ship but don't you think
Nortel - and the board in which he served on for two years
before being parachuted as CEO - is being a tad too
generous? Then again, Nortel's board believes Owens helped save the
company when he stepped in as CEO in April 2004 after Dunn was fired
for "cause". (What's going on with the legal action between Nortel and
Dunn, anyway?) When Zafirovski was hired in October, Nortel chairman
Harry Pearce
was over-the-top in his praise for Owens, although I suspect it had to
do with the fact Nortel likely pushed Owens out of his dream job so it
could bring on Zafirovski. Still, it's not like Owens has anything to
complain about. We should all be so lucky to hit the jackpot just
before retirement beckons.
Update: Looks like I've been "called out" by someone on a Yahoo Finance message board about some changes I made to this post to reflect the fact Owens' package is better than I originally thought. The information about the better package came from from localtechwire.com via a Google alert. I tried to strike out information within the original post but ran into some technical difficulties. I apologize if anyone thought I was trying to cover up mistakes, which was not my intention. If you check out the comments from this post, you'll find a link to the Yahoo message board.