I started to leaf through the latest Wired magazine
last night when it suddenly struck me it was a nice, hefty,
advertising-packed 296 pages. This took me back to the height of the dot-com
boom when magazines such as Wired, Business 2.0 (which went bi-weekly), Fast Company and the Industry Standard
regularly published heavy, back-busting issues. In fact, they were so
big, I got
into this weird habit of ripping as many ads as I could from these
paper monsters to lighten the load - there has got to be a
description for
this kind of behavior, right?. I don't think
the high-tech
magazine industry has totally rebounded back to dot-com health but
it's interesting to see Wired getting thicker. Does this suggest
the
high-industry is becoming more optimistic? Maybe. I guess what's
encouraging
about Wired's return is its advertiser roster is chock-a-block with
blue-chip
firms such as Toyota, Sun, Acura, Motorola, Sony and Microsoft.
There is a comforting absence of all those hot Web 2.0 start-ups. When
you see these guys start advertising in Wired, sell everything because
the party is probably over. One thing about Wired is it seems have
recaptured its "cool" factor. There was a time not so long ago
when Wired lost me as a reader. Perhaps it was simply information
overload given I read a lot - much of it not on paper - or it
could have been Wired lost its focus trying to figure out whether
it wanted to be a tech magazine or a business magazine or both or
neither. In any event, I got lured back to Wired by a ultra-low
subscription offer (those $2 a month deals that used to be mysteriously
unavailable to Canadians) so I'm back in the fold. For me, the
high-tech magazine comeback will really be complete when freelance
writing
assignments start to materialize again. During the boom, editors were
wonderfully desperate for content because they needed something to fill
those
annoying gaps between advertisements!
|
||||||||
Wired Magazine: Barometer of Industry Health?
by
Mark Evans
on Tue 29 Nov 2005 08:04 AM EST | Permanent Link
I started to leaf through the latest Wired magazine
last night when it suddenly struck me it was a nice, hefty,
advertising-packed 296 pages. This took me back to the height of the dot-com
boom when magazines such as Wired, Business 2.0 (which went bi-weekly), Fast Company and the Industry Standard
regularly published heavy, back-busting issues. In fact, they were so
big, I got
into this weird habit of ripping as many ads as I could from these
paper monsters to lighten the load - there has got to be a
description for
this kind of behavior, right?. I don't think
the high-tech
magazine industry has totally rebounded back to dot-com health but
it's interesting to see Wired getting thicker. Does this suggest
the
high-industry is becoming more optimistic? Maybe. I guess what's
encouraging
about Wired's return is its advertiser roster is chock-a-block with
blue-chip
firms such as Toyota, Sun, Acura, Motorola, Sony and Microsoft.
There is a comforting absence of all those hot Web 2.0 start-ups. When
you see these guys start advertising in Wired, sell everything because
the party is probably over. One thing about Wired is it seems have
recaptured its "cool" factor. There was a time not so long ago
when Wired lost me as a reader. Perhaps it was simply information
overload given I read a lot - much of it not on paper - or it
could have been Wired lost its focus trying to figure out whether
it wanted to be a tech magazine or a business magazine or both or
neither. In any event, I got lured back to Wired by a ultra-low
subscription offer (those $2 a month deals that used to be mysteriously
unavailable to Canadians) so I'm back in the fold. For me, the
high-tech magazine comeback will really be complete when freelance
writing
assignments start to materialize again. During the boom, editors were
wonderfully desperate for content because they needed something to fill
those
annoying gaps between advertisements!
Comments
Re: Wired Magazine: Barometer of Industry Health?
by
Tyler
on Tue 29 Nov 2005 11:11 AM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Hey Mark, I remember plotting page counts of Wired with the movement of the Nasdaq Stock Market during the dot-com ups and downs. I found that when the number of pages each month, as an expression of ad counts, were put into a line chart it would roughly match the movement of the Nasdaq. Same held for Business 2.0 and other dot-com era mags.
Re: Wired Magazine: Barometer of Industry Health?
by
Mark Evans
on Tue 29 Nov 2005 11:24 AM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
last month, wired was about 200 pages so maybe i should "borrow" your methodology!
Re: Re: Wired Magazine: Barometer of Industry Health?
by
Stuart MacDonald
on Tue 29 Nov 2005 02:28 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
If you did a cross-ref to % of pages devoted to dotcoms advertising to other dotcoms, then I think it works this time, too - if nothing else to show that (as you said, Mark) maybe, just maybe, it is different this time.
Love what you write, guys (both of you, and heck I'll throw Mathew in for good measure :)) - Stuart Re: Wired Magazine: Barometer of Industry Health?
by
GMapsMania
on Tue 29 Nov 2005 03:56 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Mark,
I had the same thought when I picked up WIRED this month (must renew my Rogers Mag Service cheap subscription).. I've been a WIRED reader forever and loved the Toronto telephone book days of old, but look closely at this issue.. Its entire mid section is a basically a cross promotion of WIRED's spinoff magazine 'TEST', a consumer guide to cool toys. I think if you take that "advertising section" out, along with the Christmas season ads you'll find that it's a regular size.. BTW - my favourite "thick issue" was 4.12 - Mother Earth Mother Board (Neal Stephenson)!! :) I like the retro re-naming of the blog, and I'm liking your posts on RealTechNews! Cheers, Mike. -- Google Maps Mania http://www.gmapsmania.com Re: Re: Wired Magazine: Barometer of Industry Health?
by
Mark Evans
on Tue 29 Nov 2005 04:55 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
thanks for pointing out wired's sneaky marketing move! still, it no longer feels like a brochure.
mark Re: Re: Wired Magazine: Barometer of Industry Health?
by
Anonymous
on Sun 04 Dec 2005 02:15 PM EST | Permanent Link
Chris Anderson, Wired's editor, here:
Actually, the gadget guide in the December and the stand-alone spin-off are entirely different. The first is called "Tools" and it's a guide to new and forthcoming gadgets using the usual catalog-style format. The second is called "Test" and it's a hands-on Consumer Reports-style review of gadgets already on the market. Everything in Test has been, as the name suggests, tested in our lab or in situ. Think of Tools as the promise of gadgets just hitting the market, and Test as the reality of what's been available for at least a few months (long enough to test). There's almost no overlap between them. Re: Re: Wired Magazine: Barometer of Industry Health?
by
sabinuta
on Thu 28 Jun 2007 11:25 AM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
I need to learn to eat slow i'm always in a hurry and this can really affect my body. Hope i'll learn that vitamins and herbs are my friends and i need help.
Re: Wired Magazine: Barometer of Industry Health?
by
Penguin
on Tue 29 Nov 2005 06:37 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Nice to see Wired is doing well... even when other publications are slowly dying because of loss of ad and classified revenues to online publications
|
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel and Twitterrati. You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||||||
|
||||||||