Buried in the mountain of court documents related to the patent dispute beween Research in Motion
and NTP is a statement by the U.S. government that any move that would
ban Blackberry usage in the U.S. could affect "essential" government
services. (the full story - an exclusive, by the way - is in today's Financial Post.)
In other words, the Blackberry has become such a crucial tool for
Congressmen, Senators and lobbyists, it would be an unmitigated disaster if
NTP won an injunction banning its use. So what is the U.S.
government saying? It either wants RIM and NTP to settle their dispute
- with the encouragement of the courts - or they are planning a massive
switch to Treos, which is very unlikely. If you're the investment group
behind NTP, does the $450 million settlement offer look more
attractive? Maybe RIM needs to sweeten the pot to make it happen or
maybe RIM feels it finally has the upper-hand in a long and troublesome
dispute. It is hard not to get the feeling this dispute may wrap
up sooner than later.
|
||||
|
Friday, November 11
by
Mark Evans
on Fri 11 Nov 2005 03:02 PM EST
Buried in the mountain of court documents related to the patent dispute beween Research in Motion
and NTP is a statement by the U.S. government that any move that would
ban Blackberry usage in the U.S. could affect "essential" government
services. (the full story - an exclusive, by the way - is in today's Financial Post.)
In other words, the Blackberry has become such a crucial tool for
Congressmen, Senators and lobbyists, it would be an unmitigated disaster if
NTP won an injunction banning its use. So what is the U.S.
government saying? It either wants RIM and NTP to settle their dispute
- with the encouragement of the courts - or they are planning a massive
switch to Treos, which is very unlikely. If you're the investment group
behind NTP, does the $450 million settlement offer look more
attractive? Maybe RIM needs to sweeten the pot to make it happen or
maybe RIM feels it finally has the upper-hand in a long and troublesome
dispute. It is hard not to get the feeling this dispute may wrap
up sooner than later.
by
Mark Evans
on Fri 11 Nov 2005 08:48 AM EST
It's probably my fault given my enthusiasm to "apply" for new Web 2.0
services but it's getting out of hand. In the past few weeks, I've
tried out Sphere, Flock, Tailrank, Rollyo, SearchFox, Wordpress,
Slawsome and Remember the Milk. They're all interesting and some of
them are even useful (Wordpress, for example, which has become the new
platform for My Toronto
blog although I'd like to see it offer some more bells and whistles
such as statistics tools) but I feel like I'm at an all-you-can-eat
buffet and my appetite
is disappearing. What I need is a smart Web 2.0 "portal" - perhaps
Emily
Chang can evolve eHub?
- where the best of the best can be presented to meet your specific
needs. While eHub does a great job offering a smorgasbord of Web 2.0
services/apps, it's like looking at a Denny's menu where there are
pages of choices. What I want is a old-style diner menu where you've
got five or six daily specials. Maybe Michael Arrington's TechCrunch
is already doing what I'm seeking. As it now stands, there is
just so much
coming down the pipe, it's
hard to know what these services do and if they're any good - unless
they get all
kinds of hype (Flock, for example). So where does this particular
buffet "patron"
do? Until an enterprising entrepreneur steps up to the plate, I guess
I'll just
keeping eating. This isn't necessarily a bad thing because who's going
to complain about getting to try and use free services on a regular
basis. The downside is it's difficult to stay loyal because once you
start using a great "to do list" service, a new one soon pops up to
tempt you away. Who said choice is good thing?!
|
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's on Wordpress and part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||
|
||||