It wouldn't be surprising to see Vonage's PR folks and investment
bankers furiously cutting and pasting from TeleGeography's new report
on the U.S. VoIP market in the second-quarter. Vonage continues to be
the leading voice-over-broadband provider with 28% market share. The
market has grown to 2.7 million customers from 440K in Q2 2004, while
revenues are expected to be more than $1-billion this year compared
with $250-million in 2004. While Telegeography notes that cablecos such
as Time-Warner and Cablevision have posted "blistering" growth this
year and collectivley have more customers than Vonage, it said Vonage's
growth has been "remarkable by the standards of any industry: Vonage's
subscribers have more than tripled in the past 12 months." That strikes
me as excellent fodder for anyone trying to raise $600-million from an
IPO soon.
Andy Abramson, who has been talking for some time about Sprint acquiring Vonage, was quick to post today that BusinessWeek
is now touting the same line. Olga Kharif believes Sprint's lawsuit
against Vonage is so vague and lacking substance that is likely a ruse
for Sprint to get a better idea about the worth of Vonage's
intellectual property portfolio before it makes a bid. I'm thinking
Vonage CEO Jeff Citron is so anxious to create a liquidity event he's
probably willing to dance with Sprint legally if it leads to an
acquisition.
|
||||
|
Thursday, October 6
by
Mark Evans
on Thu 06 Oct 2005 11:19 AM EDT
by
Mark Evans
on Thu 06 Oct 2005 11:07 AM EDT
For years, there's been an urban myth of a huge pent-up demand for
Wi-Fi access in cafes and restaurants. It's based on the notion people
want to sip on a cappuccino while surfing the Web. Maybe it's just me
but sitting in a cafe means taking a break and talking to someone or
reading the newspaper. As a result, I'm far from taken with the news
Bell Canada will provide Wi-Fi access at Starbucks locations across
Canada. Apparently, a survey of 1,003 people - who trusts survey
results anyway? - suggests 72% of Canadians would be more likely to use
hotspots if they were available. I'd be more likely to drink free
coffee at Starbucks if it were available. When it comes to wireless
Internet access, I'm far more enthused about WiMax, particularly the
mobile variety because it will offer Internet anywhere rather than
being forced into a Starbucks. The way to look at Wi-Fi at Starbucks,
et al is its a low-cost tool to keep a small segment of the population
coming back rather than losing them to Tim Horton's where the term
"double-double" is heard way more often than "Wi-Fi".
If you want a tip on where Wi-Fi access is needed and would work economically, it's hospitals. I spent four hours last week waiting while my daughter had her broken leg checked out. I would have killed - and paid - for some Internet access!
by
Mark Evans
on Thu 06 Oct 2005 10:12 AM EDT
By now, AOL's $25-million purchase of Jason Calacanis' Weblogs Inc.
has been widely strewn throughout the blogosphere and into the
mainstream media. Lots of pats on the back for Calacanis for scoring
another entrepreneurial home run. Strategically, the move makes
complete sense for AOL, which has been aggressively driving to an
advertising business model as its dial-up access business evaporates
(20.9 million subscribers and not going strong). Over the past
few years, AOL vice-chair Ted Leonsis
has been transforming the company by removing the walled garden - a
strategy that's working given AOL's Web properties have more than 100
million unique visitors a month in the U.S. So what does Weblogs bring
to the mix? The simple answer is: more traffic as its 80 or so blogs
generate 30 million page views a month and another 25 million through
RSS feeds. AOL apparently plans to sprinkle its newly-purchased blogs
through sites such as Moviefone, AOL Music and Netscape - providing
even more reason for people to visit these sites and, as important,
give more reason for advertisers to come on over. At an even higher
level, you now have to wonder if AOL's purchase of Weblogs is a sign
that discussions to sell part or all of AOL to Microsoft are dead. If
AOL is intent on enhancing its content portfolio, why would it then
turn around and make a deal with Microsoft? Time-Warner CEO Richard
Parsons has made it clear on several occasions recent that AOL is an
important part of the growth mix so it appears Time-Warner will keep
AOL within the fold.
|
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel and Twitterrati. You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||
|
||||