So here are the facts: Sprint Nextel plans to spend as much as $3-billion over the next two years to build a nation-wide Wi-Max network. From initial indications, the "winners" will be
- Intel, which is pimping the flavour of Wi-Max being used by Sprint;
- Motorola and Samsung, which were selected to supply technology;
- and consumers, who will have another option for broadband to access voice, video and data services.
   The loser is Qualcomm and the CDMA standard that has been its cash-cow in recent years. As well, Craig McCaw's Clearwire, which will have another rival in the Wi-Max market. Oddly enough, Clearwire just raised $900-million from Intel Capital and Motorola so perhaps they're looking to hedge their bets, or just happy to suppiler equipment to whoever wants it. One more thought: Is it just me or does this aggressive infrastructure spending feel is a little like the telecom boom? Back then, it was fiber-optic networks to provide broadband service. Now, it's high-speed wireless networks to offer broadband service. What's the difference other than there are fewer "CLECs" in the game?
   For more views, check out Joseph Laszlo, who balks at Sprint's insistence on using the terms "4G", Phonescoop, GigaOm and dailywireless.org.
Update: As one of the people who made a comment pointed out, Sprint's Wi-Max strategy could give Rogers and Bell Canada some ammunition to ramp up marketing for their Inukshuk joint venture, which launched Wi-Max service earlier this year. I suspect part of their cautiousness has been the desire to work out any bugs and wait for user-friendly technology such as laptop modems that incorporate Wi-Max and Wi-Fi.