In a tight race, Liberal MP Sam Bulte lost her seat in the House of Parliament to Peggy Nash. You have to wonder how much of an impact the blogosphere had given the big election issue in her riding - copyright reform and Bulte's tight relationship with the music, film, software and publishing leaders industry - emerged because of work done by bloggers such as Michael Geist. While voters in other parts of the country focused on health care and the economy, people in Bulte's riding were suddenly questioning the copyright reform process. Of course, Bulte's might have also lost because voters simply wanted change but you can't discount the role bloggers played. One episode that perhaps demonstrated the blogosphere's influence was the focus on Bulte's decision to participate in a $250-a-plate fundraiser organized by music, software, film and publishing leaders. The optics of holding it four days before the election were terrible and it was exacerbated by how bloggers went to town on it. With Bulte now out of work, it will be interesting to see if she follows through on her threat to sue Geist.
For other views on Bulte's defeat, check out Geist, Boing Boing, Accordion Guy and Tech Dirt. The Toronto Star has comments from Bulte and Nash. (Hat tip to Rob Hyndman for doing the early-morning leg work on the links!)
|
||||
|
Bulte Loses; Did the Blogs Help?
by
Mark Evans
on Tue 24 Jan 2006 07:17 AM EST | Permanent Link
Comments
Re: Bulte Loses; Did the Blogs Help?
by
Stuart MacDonald
on Tue 24 Jan 2006 01:10 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
The furor in the blogosphere absolutely contributed here, but not in the way that many of the "information wants to be free" types might hope. What it did was unearth the lousy decision Bulte made in going along with the idea of the fundraiser, which called her judgment into question and got real-live voters real-live talking about it. How much of an impact? Only pollsters would be able to answer that one, and I'm not intending to pay them to find out. But yup, I can tell you that when I spoke with people about the fundraiser (I live in her riding) they were "What? Are you serious? How stupid is that?" And I only knew about it because it was getting heavy bloggerage, and said heavy bloggerage begot mainstream coverage. But all that said, fact is, regardless of her position on copyright, if she hadn't made the bad call of saying Yes to the fundraiser, she might still be an MP. The blogosphere surfaced it, but the problem was of her own making.
-- Stuart Re: Bulte Loses; Did the Blogs Help?
by
Mark Evans
on Tue 24 Jan 2006 03:36 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
until the blogosphere started talking about bulte's fundraising plans, i hadn't paid too much attention to copyright reform. now, i'm getting in to it so there's one positive
Re: Bulte Loses; Did the Blogs Help?
by
Rohan Jayasekera
on Tue 24 Jan 2006 04:09 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
I live in Bulte's riding (now ex-riding) and was canvassed by a Liberal last Thursday. When I yelled at him about her role in Bill C-60, he knew what I was talking about and gave the party line about how it's good for artists. He didn't seem the least bit surprised by my outburst, which suggests that I'm far from the only voter in the riding concerned about the issue. So I suspect that the blogosphere did have an impact. Some of it would be indirect, however, because the story was picked up by various print media widely read by people here.
Re: Bulte Loses; Did the Blogs Help?
by
Anonymous
on Tue 24 Jan 2006 09:28 PM EST | Permanent Link
Mark: While I think blogs are great, I think it is mainly the converted speaking to the converted. Bulte didn't lose because of blogs -- she lost because of the problems facing the Liberals and Toronto's silver spoon socialist mentality. To give Michael Geist credit for this is going a touch too far -- he's only looking for where he can get his name into print every day (Monday, Toronto Star. Check. Tuesday. National Post. Check. Wednesday. Ottawa Citizen. Check....).
Canada's copyright legislation needs to be reformed. But if it is, then what is Michael Geist going to talk to the media about? Ecommerce? That said, C-60 has some serious issues relating to copyright and the media, so hopefully the Conservatives can work that out and push this forward. I'm not fond of thinking of Canada as some version of China when it comes to intellectual property. -Robert Re: Re: Bulte Loses; Did the Blogs Help?
by
Stuart MacDonald
on Wed 25 Jan 2006 01:56 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
I think you are right to a great extent, Robert. The blogoshpere is a bit of a funhouse mirror place, where the bloggers all talk to many of the same themes at the same time ("meme") and to a great extent talk to each other. Also, and many have a specific drum to beat. However, as a student of the web and consumer behaviour, I would be willing to wager that there were a few thousand votes that swung away from Bulte because of the fundraiser and smelliness of the industry hosting (note: not because of copyright reform). I live in the riding, and folks were talking about it -- after church, at the playground, at the coffee shop. That would not have happened if not for the bloggerage.
-- Stuart Re: Re: Bulte Loses; Did the Blogs Help?
by
Mark Evans
on Wed 25 Jan 2006 02:10 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
rob,
i take your points but i think the blogs, particularly geist's, played at least a small role in the stink about bulte's fundraising activity. at the very least, it may have got the attention of the mainstream media, which was clearly engrossed with issues other than copyright reform. this wasn't necessarily a copyright issue but bloggers calling bulte on her choices, which i think may have cost her the election. Re: Re: Re: Bulte Loses; Did the Blogs Help?
by
Anonymous
on Thu 26 Jan 2006 10:14 AM EST | Permanent Link
Gents: I guess I just don't see a difference between a group of arts supporters giving Bulte money and the CAW giving money to the NDP. Because the blogsphere is littered with left of centre types, no one wants to raise the issue of where the NDP -- and Peggy Nash -- got their cash. If the CAW or CUPE held a fundraiser for Nash or Layton, no one would blink. It is a double standard.
As for the blogsphere -- if you guys can swing a few thousand votes in a riding, despite the fact only a few hundred people read your sites each day -- then that is surely impressive. But I wouldn't go around patting each other on the back quite yet. That said, Evans, I thought your Post column was the only balanced one on this issue. Re: Re: Re: Re: Bulte Loses; Did the Blogs Help?
by
Anonymous
on Thu 26 Jan 2006 12:42 PM EST | Permanent Link
This post sounds like it comes from yet another MSM type who underestimates the blogosphere. I can't speak for Giest's blog, but I'm guessing his numbers are better than a few hundred a day. Boingboing claims 1.7 million readers a day. Add in all the others blogs that covered this with varying readership (including MSM blogs at Macleans, Star, Globe) and the numbers are not insignificant. May want to take a mulligan on that one as the question here isn't readership but whether the issue actually influenced voters.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Bulte Loses; Did the Blogs Help?
by
Stuart MacDonald
on Thu 26 Jan 2006 08:33 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Well Mr./Ms. Nymous, I don't think that there is much to be gained by rehashing the issue, yet again. The optics were nasty for many -- maybe not for you, which is completely fair -- and it was blogs that unearthed the event for consideration. If you did not find the situation offensive, then I would have expected -- if you live in her riding -- that you would have voted for her. Um, that's how it works.
And I agree that Mark's piece was very good. Tricky topic, well navigated. -- Stuart |
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel and Twitterrati. You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||
|
||||